Disney+ CDN

Sun Apr 28 14:53:11 UTC 2019

My understanding is that they are launching using commercial CDNs. Highly
likely those CDNs don't know what their traffic share will be like just yet.

The ASN you're seeing pop up is a mid tier, not for delivery.

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:38 PM Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:

> but hey...  they're getting transit from VZB\MCI\UUNET...  so it'll be
> great!
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Jon Lewis" <jlewis at lewis.org>
> *To: *"NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org>
> *Sent: *Friday, April 26, 2019 4:51:58 PM
> *Subject: *Re: Disney+ CDN
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I'm going to send them an email and see if I can get ahold of
> their peering policy.
> > I'm hoping they will update it as they get more attention from other
> networks. They may just be procrastinating
> > setting things up. According to bgp.he.net they are only announcing one
> v4 /24 and one v6 /48, which could be
> > enough IPs, but seems a little on the small side.
>
> I'd be much more worried about only being on one IX than only advertising
> a single /24 and /48.  I'm guessing they've just not fully fleshed out the
> peeringdb entry and maybe not fully built out the network infrastructure
> yet.  A CDN, with everything coming from one POP in NY is not going to cut
> it.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
>                               |  therefore you are
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190428/30636289/attachment.html>