Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation

Sat Apr 27 20:20:23 UTC 2019

On 27/04/2019 06:44, William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:48 PM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com 
> <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
> > Do you honestly believe that hijackings are being committed by ARIN 
> members or even ARIN resource holders that have signed RSAs with ARIN?
>
> Wasn't Softlayer (an ARIN resource holder) called out on this list 
> about 14 hours ago for hijacking a couple /24s? And honest mistake no 
> doubt but come on man, the hijackings happen.

I don't think the proposal is talking about valid mistakes.  The 
proposal is talking about active, repetitive, BGP hijacking.  If you 
disagree with the proposal, can you state what your proposed solution is 
for BGP hijacks?  What should we as a community do to prevent them from 
happening before some government/int'l agency mandates what they 
consider would be their solution?    Or do we just continue to drumbeat 
MANRS, post major BGP hijacks on NANOG and carry-on as we have for the 
past decade?

-Hank

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190427/5d508f85/attachment.html>