Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

Sat Apr 27 17:33:37 UTC 2019

Welcome to the Internet. 

----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Rich Kulawiec" <rsk at gsp.org> 
To: nanog at nanog.org 
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 10:34:44 AM 
Subject: Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS? 

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 06:31:08PM -0700, William Herrin wrote: 
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:06 PM John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote: 
> 
> > I assumed that something this sleazy would be offshore, but their 
> > terms of service say they're in Los Angeles. 
> > 
> 
> They tricked you. [snip] 

Also, unless I'm misreading their site, they expect users to download/run 
an application program of unknown provenance and function, from an operation 
that has gone to great lengths to conceal its location and principals. 
What could possibly go wrong? 

---rsk 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190427/6a130680/attachment.html>