Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. amitchell at isipp.com
Fri Apr 26 14:40:46 UTC 2019



> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:10 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> 
> So providers should stamp this out (because it is “bad”) and support customers who are running TOR nodes (because those are “good”). Did I get that right?

If that is how you see it, then it's right for you.  At no time did I mention TOR, nor will I get dragged into that discussion.

Anne

Attorney at Law
GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Legislative Consultant
CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute
Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS
California Bar Association
Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
Colorado Cyber Committee
Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose





More information about the NANOG mailing list