Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

• Previous message (by thread): Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Next message (by thread): Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:

> Just ran into packetstream.io:

> How can this not be a violation of the ToS of just about every major provider?

Sounds like a "paid" TOR.  Is TOR a ToS violation too -- the EFF would 
probably like to hear of it if so.  Or just the aspect of reselling 
one's service?


/mark

• Previous message (by thread): Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Next message (by thread): Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]