Disney+ CDN

Sat Apr 13 14:20:46 UTC 2019

AFAIK, HBO now/go is running on the newer Broadpeak gear+umbrella (Paseo)... at least for LatAm. 

> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:01:33 -0700
> From: Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net>
> To: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN
> Message-ID:
>    <CAHuchRBwmnUBYCk=1fObSvM-Vhbgi8WAXPUqhdbWxBcKQcOmDA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO
> are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs.
> I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from.
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN?  Like Netflix oca,
>> Akamai aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> disneyplus.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Aaron
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron Graves
>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM
>> *To:* nanog at nanog.org
>> *Subject:* Disney+ CDN
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content
>> distribution once they leave Netflix?  Would be nice if they'd provide an
>> on-prem cache server.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> AG
>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/50f1332e/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mark Milhollan <mlm at pixelgate.net>
> To: NANOG list <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers
> Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1904121153310.32548 at arcghar.ybpny>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Tore Anderson wrote:
>> 
>> We've been wanting to replace our all of our ad-hoc OOB links with a
>> standardised setup based on LTE connectivity to an embedded
>> login/console server at each PoP. IPv6 would be perfect due to no
>> CGNAT and infinitesimal levels of background scanning.
>> 
>> Unfortunately Telenor has decided to deploy a central firewall that
>> drops all inbound connections, making their service totally unusable
>> for our use case. I guess they don't want our money.
> 
> Sounds like the console server will need to "phone home".  That a 
> workaround might be possible doesn't make a firewall which the user 
> cannot control to some degree less annoying.  Though it might be that 
> Telenor just needs to be notified/reminded that power users and business 
> customers exist.
> 
> 
> /mark
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:31:24 -0400
> From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
> To: Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net>
> Cc: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN
> Message-ID:
>    <CAC1-dt=tFfZGv=ACX8b1vB6-0X3DY=rqE0hA6UkLKxuNixOjsA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net> wrote:
>> 
>> An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO
>> are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs.
>> I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from.
>> 
> 
> Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and build their own:
> https://www.thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-acquire-majority-ownership-bamtech/
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN?  Like Netflix oca,
>>> Akamai aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> disneyplus.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Aaron
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron
>>> Graves
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM
>>> *To:* nanog at nanog.org
>>> *Subject:* Disney+ CDN
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content
>>> distribution once they leave Netflix?  Would be nice if they'd provide an
>>> on-prem cache server.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> AG
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> @ChrisGrundemann
> http://chrisgrundemann.com
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/c0b47cad/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:34:22 -0400
> From: Tom Beecher <beecher at beecher.cc>
> To: Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net>
> Cc: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN
> Message-ID:
>    <CAL9Qcx6LVWBDSL7Likc=VcuHPx+YX3HGSA5jyp+edqc19TETew at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> I wouldn't expect them to build out anything until they got some usage data
> to determine the build/buy economics.
> 
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:02 PM Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net> wrote:
>> 
>> An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO
>> are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs.
>> I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from.
>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN?  Like Netflix oca,
>>> Akamai aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> disneyplus.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Aaron
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron
>>> Graves
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM
>>> *To:* nanog at nanog.org
>>> *Subject:* Disney+ CDN
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content
>>> distribution once they leave Netflix?  Would be nice if they'd provide an
>>> on-prem cache server.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> AG
>>> 
>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/82d94b92/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:37:54 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net>
> To: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
> Cc: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>, Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net>
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN
> Message-ID:
>    <1660830854.2724.1555097871560.JavaMail.mhammett at ThunderFuck>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> $1.6B for less than half of the company and they don't even source the bits themselves? Hrm.... 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> From: "Chris Grundemann" <cgrundemann at gmail.com> 
> To: "Jared Geiger" <jared at compuwizz.net> 
> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org> 
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 2:31:24 PM 
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jared Geiger < jared at compuwizz.net > wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs. I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from. 
> 
> 
> 
> Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and build their own: 
> https://www.thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-acquire-majority-ownership-bamtech/ 
> 
> 
> 
> <blockquote>
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould < aaron1 at gvtc.com > wrote: 
> 
> <blockquote>
> 
> 
> 
> Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN? Like Netflix oca, Akamai aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ? 
> 
> disneyplus.com 
> 
> -Aaron 
> 
> 
> 
> From: NANOG [mailto: nanog-bounces at nanog.org ] On Behalf Of Aaron Graves 
> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM 
> To: nanog at nanog.org 
> Subject: Disney+ CDN 
> 
> 
> Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content distribution once they leave Netflix? Would be nice if they'd provide an on-prem cache server. 
> 
> 
> 
> AG 
> </blockquote>
> 
> </blockquote>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> @ChrisGrundemann 
> http://chrisgrundemann.com 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/0458e5b4/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:42:30 +0000
> From: Luke Guillory <lguillory at reservetele.com>
> To: Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net>, Chris Grundemann
>    <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
> Cc: Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net>, NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: RE: Disney+ CDN
> Message-ID:
>    <8D89F96B7AB1B84F9E049CC7BB91BF5C027FD35C72 at RTC-EXCH01.RESERVE.LDS>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> They owned 33% and bought another 42% making it an even 75%.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Luke
> 
> 
> ns
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 2:38 PM
> To: Chris Grundemann
> Cc: Jared Geiger; NANOG
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN
> 
> $1.6B for less than half of the company and they don't even source the bits themselves?  Hrm....
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ________________________________
> From: "Chris Grundemann" <cgrundemann at gmail.com<mailto:cgrundemann at gmail.com>>
> To: "Jared Geiger" <jared at compuwizz.net<mailto:jared at compuwizz.net>>
> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org<mailto:nanog at nanog.org>>
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 2:31:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jared Geiger <jared at compuwizz.net<mailto:jared at compuwizz.net>> wrote:
> An article mentioned BAMTech's platform which is what NHL, MLB, and HBO GO are built on. The bits from the first two come from Akamai and Level3 CDNs. I haven't looked into where HBO Go comes from.
> 
> Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and build their own:
> https://www.thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-acquire-majority-ownership-bamtech/
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:58 PM Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com<mailto:aaron1 at gvtc.com>> wrote:
> Have we found out yet if Disney+ will have a CDN?  Like Netflix oca, Akamai aanp, google ggc, facebook fna … a Disney isp-located cdn presence ?
> 
> disneyplus.com<http://disneyplus.com>
> 
> -Aaron
> 
> 
> 
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org<mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org>] On Behalf Of Aaron Graves
> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 7:22 PM
> To: nanog at nanog.org<mailto:nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Disney+ CDN
> 
> Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content distribution once they leave Netflix?  Would be nice if they'd provide an on-prem cache server.
> 
> AG
> 
> 
> --
> @ChrisGrundemann
> http://chrisgrundemann.com
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190412/e51d9b3f/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:23:29 -0700
> From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer at mauigateway.com>
> To: <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN
> Message-ID: <20190412132329.40399BD at m0117459.ppops.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> 
> 
> --- cgrundemann at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>
> 
> Yep, they decided to buy BAMTech and build their own:
> https://www.thewaltdisneycompany.com/walt-disney-company-acquire-majority-ownership-bamtech/
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> https://www.bamtechmedia.com/company
> 
> 2004 - "Patent awarded for GeoLocation"
> 
> I'd be interested in learning about how well that one works!
> 
> scott
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:43:56 -0400
> From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu>
> To: surfer at mauigateway.com
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Disney+ CDN
> Message-ID: <1720.1555112636 at turing-police>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:23:29 -0700, "Scott Weeks" said:
> 
>> 2004 - "Patent awarded for GeoLocation"
>> 
>> I'd be interested in learning about how well that one works!
> 
> Under US law, ideas submitted for patent need be "non-obvious". There's no
> requirement they actually be a good idea. Though I guess that it should prevent
> the patenting of obvious bad ideas - but $DEITY knows there's plenty of subtly
> flawed concepts out there....  (And there's ample evidence that the USPTO is on
> occasion challenged by the "obviousness" requirement...)
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 11:13:48 +0200
> From: Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no>
> To: Mark Milhollan <mlm at pixelgate.net>, NANOG list <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers
> Message-ID: <6e81e3d5-ed9b-eedc-5ec8-be782e477467 at fud.no>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> * Mark Milhollan
>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Tore Anderson wrote:
>>> 
>>> We've been wanting to replace our all of our ad-hoc OOB links with a
>>> standardised setup based on LTE connectivity to an embedded
>>> login/console server at each PoP. IPv6 would be perfect due to no
>>> CGNAT and infinitesimal levels of background scanning.
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately Telenor has decided to deploy a central firewall that
>>> drops all inbound connections, making their service totally unusable
>>> for our use case. I guess they don't want our money.
>> 
>> Sounds like the console server will need to "phone home".  That a workaround might be possible doesn't make a firewall which the user cannot control to some degree less annoying.  Though it might be that Telenor just needs to be notified/reminded that power users and business customers exist.
> 
> Phoning home is not an option here, as the whole point is to have an OOB backdoor that works even if «home» is totally FUBAR.
> 
> For that reason it needs to be completely independent of the production network. Standard Internet connections are perfect, IFF they are bi-directional.
> 
> Tore
> 
> 
> End of NANOG Digest, Vol 135, Issue 13
> **************************************