CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

Michael Bullut main at kipsang.com
Wed Sep 26 07:59:02 UTC 2018


Hi Ross,

How would you gauge good DNS performance?

Warm regards,

Michael.


On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 10:50, Ross Tajvar <ross at tajvar.io> wrote:

> Do note that ping response times are not a good indicator of DNS
> performance.
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:48 AM Michael Bullut <main at kipsang.com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings Team,
>>
>> Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A
>> quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S.
>> resolvers:
>>
>> *C:\Users\bullutm>ping 1.1.1.1*
>>
>> *Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:*
>> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=61*
>> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61*
>> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=61*
>> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61*
>>
>> *Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>:*
>> *    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),*
>> *Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:*
>> *    Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 4ms*
>>
>> *C:\Users\bullutm>*
>>
>> *-------*
>>
>> *C:\Users\bullutm>tracert 1.1.1.1*
>>
>> *Tracing route to one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]*
>> *over a maximum of 30 hops:*
>>
>> *  1     4 ms     3 ms     4 ms  10.101.129.254*
>> *  2     6 ms    20 ms     7 ms  10.98.0.165*
>> *  3     7 ms    13 ms    15 ms  10.98.0.233*
>> *  4     7 ms     5 ms     4 ms  one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]*
>>
>> *Trace complete.*
>>
>> *C:\Users\bullutm>*
>>
>> Warm regards,
>>
>> Michael Bullut.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> *Cell:*
>> *+254 723 393 114.**Skype Name:* *Michael Bullut.*
>> *Twitter:*
>> * @Kipsang <http://twitter.com/Kipsang/>*
>> *Blog: http://www.kipsang.com/ <http://www.kipsang.com/>*
>> *E-mail:* *main at kipsang.com <main at kipsang.com>*
>>
>> *---*
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180926/5cba836a/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list