OpenDNS CGNAT Issues

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Sep 12 04:58:36 UTC 2018


On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:06 PM Jerry Cloe <jerry at jtcloe.net> wrote:

> OpenDNS, or anyone for that matter, should never see 100.64/10 ip's. If
> they do, something is wrong at the source, and OpenDNS wouldn't be able to
> reply anyway (or at least have the reply route back to the user).
>

maybeopendns peers directly with such an eyeball network? and in that case
maybe they have an agreement to accept traffic from the 100.64 space?


>
>
> -----Original message-----
> *From:* Aled Morris via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> *Sent:* Tue 09-11-2018 11:57 am
> *Subject:* Re: OpenDNS CGNAT Issues
> *To:* cb.list6 at gmail.com;
> *CC:* NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>;
>
> Incidentally, I hope OpenDNS considers 100.64.0.0/10 as space that can't
> be registered to any end-user.
>
> Aled
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180911/9d23bf30/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list