It's been 20 years today (Oct 16, UTC). Hard to believe.
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Wed Oct 17 19:43:20 UTC 2018
* Laszlo Hanyecz:
> On 2018-10-17 02:35, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> I believe that the IETF party line these days is that Postel was wrong
>> on this point. Security is one consideration, but there are others.
> Postel's maxim also allowed extensibility. If our network code rejects
> (or crashes) on things we don't currently understand and use, it ensures
> that they can't be used by apps that come along later either. The
> attitude of rejecting everything in the name of security is what has
> forced app developers to tunnel APIs and everything else inside HTTP/DNS.
To be fair, a lot of these components that make extending protocols
hard are both receivers and senders. If they are asked to forward
garbage, then something has to give.
More information about the NANOG