bloomberg on supermicro: sky is falling
bzs at theworld.com
bzs at theworld.com
Wed Oct 10 19:26:39 UTC 2018
On October 10, 2018 at 17:58 SNaslund at medline.com (Naslund, Steve) wrote:
> It only proves that you have seen the card at some point. Useless.
>
> Steven Naslund
> Chicago IL
>
> >I'm pretty sure the "entire point" of inventing CVV was to prove you
> >physically have the card.
>
It's not useless, it protects against what it protects. Like
dumpster-diving in the imprint days or if someone gets hold of all the
credit card numbers + expirations (+ names, maybe) from your
database. If you don't store CVVs (which is forbidden by contract)
they won't have CVVs and sites which require them won't accept
transactions. It's kind of like a PIN but yes too easily stolen.
A friend used to write "ASK FOR PHOTO ID" in the signature portion of
his credit cards and, I saw this, cashiers would look at it, look at
his signature as if they were comparing, and say OK thank you!
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs at TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
More information about the NANOG
mailing list