new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE

Wed Oct 10 06:50:04 UTC 2018

You may use this document, which passed already the last-call and is in the AD/IESG review:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas/

My co-authors may help you to get those products …

I’ve been using myself OpenWRT for such deployments.

Regards,

Jordi

De: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> en nombre de Tom Ammon <thomasammon at gmail.com>
Fecha: miércoles, 10 de octubre de 2018, 0:14
Para: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
Asunto: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE

Are there any CPE vendors providing MAP-T features yet? I'm working on rolling v6 to residential subscribers and am trying to understand what the landscape looks like on the CPE side, for MAP-T specifically.

What about 464XLAT on a CPE - is that a thing? I know that 464XLAT has been running for a while on some mobile provider networks, but are there any vendors out there with a decent/mature CLAT implementation in a CPE product that is ready to buy right now?

Thanks, 

Tom

-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Ammon
M: (801) 784-2628
thomasammon at gmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181010/44354c92/attachment.html>