Towards an RPKI-rich Internet (and the appropriate allocation of responsibility in the event an RIR RPKI CA outage)

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon Oct 1 08:20:26 UTC 2018


On 1/Oct/18 01:21, John Curran wrote:

>  
>  
>
> It is possible to architect the various legalities surrounding RPKI to
> support any of the above outcomes, but it first requires a shared
> understanding of what the network community believes is the correct
> outcome.   There is likely some on the nanog mailing list who have a
> view on this matter, so I pose the question of "who should be
> responsible" for consequences of RPKI RIR CA failure to this list for
> further discussion.

John, in the instance where all RIR's transition to a single "All
Resource" TA, what would, in your mind, be the (potential) liability
considerations?

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181001/994b52f1/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list