NANOG Security Track: Route Security

• Previous message (by thread): NANOG Security Track: Route Security
• Next message (by thread): NANOG Security Track: Route Security
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Agreed, especially if they’re an active member of the organization and doesn’t seem to be synonymous with NANOGs Charter.  

Jason 

On Sep 30, 2018, at 22:41, Brian Kantor <Brian at ampr.org> wrote:

>> To ensure unimpeded information sharing and discussion, the
>> Security Track will not be broadcast or recorded.
> 
> I fail to understand how making the presentations secret from all
> except those attending in person promotes information sharing.
> Could whoever made this seemingly contradictory decision explain
> the reasoning behind it?
>    - Brian
> 

• Previous message (by thread): NANOG Security Track: Route Security
• Next message (by thread): NANOG Security Track: Route Security
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]