Ignacio de castro
ignactro at gmail.com
Thu Nov 22 19:48:46 UTC 2018
It is indeed hard to say how useful is to know hop counts when a large
fraction of IXP member are remote and plenty of content is cached, but that
question was bugging me too and I have been looking into it. From what we
could see, pretty stable around 5 hops.
Disclaimer this is an ongoing work. Feedback welcome!
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 7:33 PM Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf at dessus.com> wrote:
> >> I'd argue that's just content (though admittedly a lot of it).
> "just static content" would be more accurate ...
> >I would further argue that you can't cache active Web content, like
> >bank account statements, utility billing, help desk request/responses,
> >equipment status, and other things that change constantly.
> There were many attempts at this by Johhny-cum-lately ISPs back in the
> 90's -- particularly Telco and Cableco's -- with their "transparent
> poxies". Eventually they discovered that it was more cost efficient to
> actually provide the customer with what the customer had purchased.
> The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says
> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> >Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 2018 20:45
> >To: nanog at nanog.org
> >Subject: Re: Internet diameter?
> >On 11/21/2018 07:32 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NANOG