darin.steffl at mnwifi.com
Sat Nov 24 16:59:21 UTC 2018
It seems wasteful for Amazon to connect to an IX but then ignore peering
requests for a year.
They have 40G of connectivity but are unresponsive. I'll try emailing all
the other contacts listed in peeringdb.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 10:38 AM Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net wrote:
> I've e-mailed my contacts there a couple times on people's behalf. No
> response yet.
> It seems like a lot of organizations need 1 more person in their peering
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> *From: *"Darin Steffl" <darin.steffl at mnwifi.com>
> *To: *"North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog at nanog.org>
> *Sent: *Friday, November 23, 2018 10:21:51 PM
> *Subject: *Amazon Peering
> Hey all,
> Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established
> with Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times
> this Sept and Nov with no response.
> I sent to peering at amazon.com and received one automated response back so
> I know they received my email but nothing since.
> Darin Steffl
> Minnesota WiFi
> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NANOG