Verizon: Extremely Strange CPE Routing in NYC/NJ Area
Lee
ler762 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 29 22:41:42 UTC 2018
On 11/29/18, Nick Zurku <nzurku at teraswitch.com> wrote:
> Can anyone from Verizon take a look at this behavior for us?
>
> We’re having multiple Verizon FiOS users in the NYC/NJ area appear to
> teleport from their FiOS router to our IP in the Pittsburgh region.
Verizon is doing something seriously weird to windows traceroute:
C:\Users\Lee>tracert www.yahoo.com
Tracing route to atsv2-fp-shed.wg1.b.yahoo.com [98.138.219.232]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms fw.home.net
2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms vbz-router.home.net [192.168.1.1]
3 8 ms 3 ms 6 ms
media-router-fp2.prod1.media.vip.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.219.232]
Trace complete.
C:\Users\Lee>ping -i 12 www.yahoo.com.
Pinging atsv2-fp-shed.wg1.b.yahoo.com [98.138.219.232] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.138.0.87: TTL expired in transit.
Reply from 98.138.0.87: TTL expired in transit.
Reply from 98.138.0.87: TTL expired in transit.
Reply from 98.138.0.87: TTL expired in transit.
Ping statistics for 98.138.219.232:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
C:\Users\Lee>ping -i 13 www.yahoo.com.
Pinging atsv2-fp-shed.wg1.b.yahoo.com [98.138.219.232] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.138.219.232: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=54
Reply from 98.138.219.232: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=54
Reply from 98.138.219.232: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=54
Reply from 98.138.219.232: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=54
Ping statistics for 98.138.219.232:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 32ms
C:\Users\Lee>
traceroute from a linux box works as expected..
Lee
> Users
> are seeing extreme slowness with TCP traffic, but ping times seem
> reasonable.
>
> User 1:
> 1 fios_quantum_gateway (192.168.1.1) 1.575 ms 2.426 ms 3.193 ms
> 2 204.16.244.8 (204.16.244.8) 2.269 ms 3.055 ms 2.727 ms
>
> User 2:
> 1 fios_quantum_gateway (192.168.1.1) 1.565 ms 1.048 ms 0.947 ms
> 2 204.16.244.8 (204.16.244.8) 2.162 ms 3.588 ms 3.048 ms
>
> I can provide end-user NYC/NJ IPs off-list if desirable.
>
>
> Here's a normal looking trace from an FiOS line locally in the Pittsburgh
> region:
>
>
> IP: 108.39.229.34
> Tracing route to four.libsyn.com [204.16.244.8]
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>
> 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
> 2 5 ms 2 ms 7 ms lo0-100.PITBPA-VFTTP-301.verizon-gni.net
> <http://lo0-100.pitbpa-vfttp-301.verizon-gni.net/> [108.39.229.1]
> 3 5 ms 6 ms 6 ms B3301.PITBPA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net
> <http://b3301.pitbpa-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net/> [100.41.223.244]
> 4 * * * Request timed out.
> 5 * * * Request timed out.
> 6 13 ms 12 ms 13 ms 0.et-7-1-5.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET
> <http://0.et-7-1-5.br1.iad8.alter.net/> [140.222.226.17]
> 7 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms verizon.com.customer.alter.net
> [152.179.50.110]
> 8 12 ms 12 ms 13 ms be3084.ccr42.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com
> [154.54.30.65]
> 9 22 ms 22 ms 22 ms be2820.rcr21.pit02.atlas.cogentco.com
> [154.54.83.54]
> 10 22 ms 22 ms 21 ms 38.104.120.90
> 11 26 ms 21 ms 19 ms 204.16.241.133
> 12 * * * Request timed out.
> 13 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms 204.16.244.8
>
> Is this a possible traffic engineering blip? I can’t say we’ve ever
> seen trace routes return such sparse results and actually make it to the
> destination.
>
> --
> Nick Zurku
> Systems Engineer
> TeraSwitch, Inc.
> Cell: 412-953-0481
> Office: 412-945-7048
> nzurku at teraswitch.com
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list