netflix OCA in a CG-NAT world
Grant Taylor
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Mon Nov 26 19:46:02 UTC 2018
On 11/25/2018 09:47 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
> Putting an OCA with bypass through the CGN with RFC1918 space will
> actually work just fine. We (Netflix) don't formally support it because
> of the vast number of non-standard CGN implementations out there, but if
> your clients are in RFC1918 space and the next hop router from the OCA
> knows how to reach them, it will just work.
Does this include RFC 6598 Shared Address Space, 100.64.0.0/10? Or is
it limited to RFC 1918 Address Space?
Does it really matter what the private IPs are? (I've seen people
re-use publicly allocated but not publicly used IP address space.) Or
does it "just work" as long as the OCA's first hop knows how to reach
the private IPs?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181126/d8a5357e/attachment.bin>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list