WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6
Morgan A. Miskell
morgan.miskell at caro.net
Mon Nov 12 16:30:56 UTC 2018
Not to beat a dead horse, but could the problem be so simple? I have
tons of dual-stacked machines that have updated forever without issue,
so I assume they update via IPV4.
That being said, I've not packet sniffed any of the update stuff in a
while but if the DNS is any indication then dual-stacked machines can
update via IPV4 while IPV6 ONLY machines will likely fail since the DNS
shows IPV4 only....
host windowsupdate.microsoft.com
windowsupdate.microsoft.com is an alias for
windowsupdate.redir.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net.
windowsupdate.redir.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net is an alias for
redir.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net.
redir.update.microsoft.com.nsatc.net has address 157.56.77.153
On 11/11/2018 01:35 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 11, 2018, at 8:45 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/Nov/18 14:02, Chris Knipe wrote:
>>
>>> Also no problems here with IPv6 and Windows Updates...
>>
>> The issue is affecting (and has affected) quite a few folk:
>>
>> https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/a9b1b537-ad27-4718-821b-57ef33174974/windows-update-fails-if-ipv6-is-enabled?forum=w8itpronetworking
>> https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/16e7aa06-9b90-48f8-8370-76c2329b93a8/windows-update-ipv6?forum=ws2016
>> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/windows-8-pro-windows-update-fails-if-ipv6-is/7ebdac22-6675-402b-ad43-e3fa8450659d
>>
>> It occurs to me that this, could, perhaps be CDN specific.
>>
>> I'm currently not in Johannesburg, but last time I checked, the majority of Windows updates were being handled by Akamai. Perhaps this is where the issue could be, although we have got local IPv6 peering with Akamai and don't generally have issues with it.
>>
>> I'll dig deeper into how Akamai may be involved when I get back home.
>
> Let me know if you see anything related to Akamai. Looking at these threads I don’t see anything really obvious and some are much older posts.
>
> - Jared
>
--
Morgan A. Miskell
CaroNet Data Centers
704-643-8330 x206
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended
only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient
you must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance on it. If
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any
unauthorized disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is
strictly prohibited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list