Yet another Quadruple DNS?
mehmet at akcin.net
Sat Mar 31 21:18:05 UTC 2018
Joining the party late.
Very disappointing to see a popular prefix being allocated/reseved for
research then being allocated to a company without public consultation. I
am sure APNIC community will ask APNIC Sr. management for an explanation.
This prefix , if it will be given to any business , should go thru a
transparent bidding process OR regular APNIC allocation process
Geoff? Paul? Any chance you can give insight?
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:04 PM Payam Poursaied <me at payam124.com> wrote:
> dig google.com @126.96.36.199
> Didn't find any news around it
More information about the NANOG