new diffserv code point LE PHB

Mikael Abrahamsson swmike at
Fri Mar 30 10:27:52 UTC 2018


I would like to bring attention to the following IETF draft:

I believe this is well under way through the IETF process, and if someone 
has strong opinions on it they should speak up. I am one of the 
proponents, as I posted to this list back in 2015:

I think it's a great idea to have a diffserv code point that is supposed 
to be treated less than best effort (for backup traffic for instance), but 
it would be nice if someone would be willing to deploy support for it as 


Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at

More information about the NANOG mailing list