Yet another Quadruple DNS?
James R Cutler
james.cutler at consultant.com
Thu Mar 29 14:46:15 UTC 2018
> On Mar 29, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Chip Marshall <chip at 2bithacker.net <mailto:chip at 2bithacker.net>> wrote:
> I think the real question is "when are we going to get some memorable
> IPv6 public recursive DNS servers?"
> 2001:4860:4860::8888 or 2620:fe::fe just aren't quite as catchy as
> 126.96.36.199 or 188.8.131.52.
> Chip Marshall <chip at 2bithacker.net <mailto:chip at 2bithacker.net>>
> http://2bithacker.net/ <http://2bithacker.net/>
Perhaps the real question is why is this important. The great mass of users simply does not even know what DNS is. And, supposedly, we wise NANOG people know how to cut and paste.
James R. Cutler
James.cutler at consultant.com <mailto:James.cutler at consultant.com>
PGP keys at http://pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu/>
More information about the NANOG