validating reachability via an ISP
baldur.norddahl at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 08:53:45 UTC 2018
Also the only traffic you will be receiving on the other provider will be
from parties that did not pick up the more specific prefix. It should
therefore be really obvious. You should not receive any traffic at all, not
even from the transit provider.
Den tor. 29. mar. 2018 10.41 skrev Baldur Norddahl <
baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>:
> If your prefix is larger than /24 you can test with a more specific prefix
> such as a /24. Announce the test prefix on just one transit provider. Then
> check with BGP services such as the looking glass service provided by the
> NLNOG RING network.
> There will be no interruption in the traffic as it will follow the less
> specific prefix everywhere the test prefix was not picked up.
> If you only have a /24 you will need to test in a service window.
> Den tor. 29. mar. 2018 01.24 skrev Andy Litzinger <
> andy.litzinger.lists at gmail.com>:
>> Hi all,
>> I have an enterprise network and do not provide transit. In one of our
>> datacenters we have our own prefixes and rely on two ISPs as BGP neighbors
>> to provide global reachability for our prefixes. One is a large regional
>> provider and the other is a large global provider.
>> Recently we took our link to the global provider offline to perform
>> maintenance on our router. Nearly immediately we were hit with alerts
>> our prefix was unreachable and BGPMon alerted that nearly 80 AS's noted
>> route had been withdrawn. We were not unreachable from every AS, but we
>> certainly were from some of the largest.
>> The root cause is that the our prefix is not being adequately
>> re-distributed globally by the regional ISP. This is unexpected and we
>> working through this with them now.
>> My question is, how can I monitor global reachability for a prefix via
>> or any specific provider I use over time? Are there various route-servers
>> I can programmatically query for my prefix and get results that include AS
>> paths? Then I could verify that an "acceptable" number of paths exist that
>> include the AS of the all the ISPs I rely upon. And what would an
>> "acceptable" number of alternate paths be?
>> thanks in advance,
More information about the NANOG