IPv6 Unique Local Addresses (was Re: New Active Exploit: memcached on port 11211 UDP & TCP being exploited for reflection attacks)

Harald Koch chk at pobox.com
Thu Mar 1 21:20:18 UTC 2018

On 1 March 2018 at 15:18, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

> Second, RFC-1918 doesn’t apply to IPv6 at all, and (fortunately) hardly
> anyone
> uses ULA (the IPv6 analogue to RFC-1918).

Wait. What's the objection to ULA? Is it just that NAT is bad, or is there
something new?


More information about the NANOG mailing list