IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Fri Jun 22 10:09:28 UTC 2018
On 22/Jun/18 10:00, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
> The problem with its IPv6 support is that is only supporting 6in4, which by the way, they call it 6to4, so it is very weird and confusing customers ...
That "6-to-4 actually means 6-in-4" was quite confusing to me as well. I
just enabled it to prove that they had a language moment there. Good
thing it didn't backfire on me :-).
> So for native IPv6 or a 6in4 tunnel, is fine, but any other transition mechanism is NOT supported, so we end up reflashing then with OpenWRT.
Not sure I'd blame them either - they develop a lot of features for
pretty much next-to-nothing; and are being enabled by customers that are
willing to take the risk for relief on budget.
They could be more inclined to fix bugs and develop corner-case features
sooner if they were in the premium market. But, as my (well-known on
this list) American friend would say, "I conjecturbate" :-).
More information about the NANOG