Scott Weeks surfer at mauigateway.com
Wed Jun 13 00:16:56 UTC 2018

On 06/12/2018 01:10 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> Apologies for the noise.  Please hit delete...

Turns out that it's only the "Re: IPv6 
faster/better proof?"  thread I can't reply to.  
I still can't.  All I wanted to say was:

--- cb.list6 at gmail.com wrote:
From: Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com>

I hear transit is dead


Funny that he also seems to take indirect aim at IPv6:

"In this case, then in such a collection of service 
cones, is there any residual value in a globally 
consistent address space? If all the traffic flows are 
constrained to sit within each service cone, then the 
residual addressing requirement is at best a requirement 
to uniquely distinguish end points just within the scope 
of the cone without any particular requirement for 
network-wide uniqueness "

That seems to point to John Day's architecture; RINA:


More information about the NANOG mailing list