What are people using for IPAM these days?
ipgoddess at gmail.com
Tue Jun 12 15:43:02 UTC 2018
If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry, so very sorry. Especially when it comes to v6.
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 8:13 AM, McBride, Mack <C-Mack.McBride at charter.com> wrote:
> Allocations, not IPs. And yes if they are reasonably static an excel spreadsheet can go higher.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter.com at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 2:40 PM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: RE: What are people using for IPAM these days?
> --- C-Mack.McBride at charter.com wrote:
> From: "McBride, Mack" <C-Mack.McBride at charter.com>
> If you are managing more than a thousand IPs allocations spreadsheets are not manageable for IPv4.
> I managed a /15, two /16s and several /24s (so, well
> over a quarter million IPs) on a spreadsheet for years.
> So, that's an 'it depends' answer.
> E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
More information about the NANOG