IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap

Matt Harris matt at netfire.net
Mon Jun 11 21:22:10 UTC 2018


On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Scott Weeks <surfer at mauigateway.com> wrote:

> Hmm...  Faster and better?
>
> The links seem to be an IPv6 cheerleader write up.
> I looked at the URLs and the URLs one pointed to and
> pulled out everything related to IPv6 being
> faster/better.
>
>
Is it possible that simply having a much smaller routing table overall in
terms of sheer number of prefixes in the DFZ has a positive performance
impact on passing packets, which coupled with the fact that implementations
may be routed better/more efficiently due to a lack of "legacy cruft"
creates a better experience for many packets?

Just a theory/hypothesis with no data to back it up.



More information about the NANOG mailing list