What are people using for IPAM these days?

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 12:51:40 UTC 2018


Literally for years, I managed a /9 and a v6 /26 in a text file checked
into a vanilla source code control system. Sophistication need depends on
your frequency of updates, dynamic allocations and regulatory needs ( read
RIR). For low turn over assignments, you may not need much.

The options Job and Jordi point to are good. The open source options are
always a go to IMHO. YMMV.

Best Regards,

-M<

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 17:38 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <
nanog at nanog.org> wrote:

> One more open source option:
>
> https://www.gestioip.net/
>
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> en nombre de Job Snijders <
> job at instituut.net>
> Fecha: domingo, 10 de junio de 2018, 23:01
> Para: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com>
> CC: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> Asunto: Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?
>
>     Hey Mike,
>
>     On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>     > Title says it all... Currently using IPPlan, but it is kinda
> antiquated..
>
>     This is always a good thing to review every 2-3 years or so.
>
>     My current favorites in the open source world are:
>
>     Netbox - https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox
>     NIPAP - http://spritelink.github.io/NIPAP/
>     ed - http://man.openbsd.org/ed ;-)
>
>     Give a few of the IPAMs out there a chance and just see which one
>     suits your operational procedures best! (Though, using a spreadsheet
>     file on a shared network drive is still not recommended.)
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     Job
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list