Intel DPDK vs Broadcom/Mellanox SDK

McBride, Mack C-Mack.McBride at charter.com
Wed Jun 6 15:34:11 UTC 2018


The Broadcom chips have some quirks that the Broadcom SDK handles and the DPDK does not.
Specifically related around port hang up after port flaps.
I am certain each chipset has quirks that are best handled by their SDK.
The vendor specific SDK is always going to work better with a their specific chipset.
That is just a given based on the vendor understanding their own chipset better.
But again for software switching other factors apply.

Mack

From: Kasper Adel [mailto:karim.adel at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 7:31 PM
To: McBride, Mack <C-Mack.McBride at charter.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Intel DPDK vs Broadcom/Mellanox SDK

Can you please provide examples on issues that you highlighted with broadcom? Are you saying i may not see the same with mellanox?

Thanks

On Monday, June 4, 2018, McBride, Mack <C-Mack.McBride at charter.com<mailto:C-Mack.McBride at charter.com>> wrote:
Use the package that corresponds to the chipset in your equipment.
Ie. Broadcom/Mellanox chips use that SDK.  Intel chips use DPDK.
With white box switches using Broadcom chips you will run into issues
If you don't use the Broadcom SDK.  Obviously your mileage will vary
based on the actual application.  If it isn't a hardware switch and is CPU based
like a home router, then there are a lot more factors and the CPU factors may
outweigh the chipset factors.  You may want to look at a list related to home
routers for more guidance.

Mack

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org<mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org>] On Behalf Of Kasper Adel
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2018 11:45 PM
To: NANOG list <nanog at nanog.org<mailto:nanog at nanog.org>>
Subject: Intel DPDK vs Broadcom/Mellanox SDK

Hi

Anothe email thread to get some guidance on points to consider when comparing new platforms that advocate using DPDK as the hardware acceleration SDK vs the broadcom/mellanox.

The DPDK ones claim enhanced performance but every time i ask questions, i get the logical and typical answer of “it depends”

Thx
Kim
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.


More information about the NANOG mailing list