unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes
ross at tajvar.io
Wed Jul 25 00:17:07 UTC 2018
Seemed pretty clear to me. He sent an abuse report to abuse at psychz.net and
it was rejected as spam.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 8:11 PM Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org> wrote:
> Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your
> complaint is.
> -mel via cell
> > On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian at ampr.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> >> can we please just stop this nonsense?
> >> ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept
> reports as-is.
> >> requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to
> >> report it to you is not acceptable.
> >>> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> >>> <abuse at psychz.net>
> >>> (reason: 550 "The mail server detected your message as spam and has
> prevented delivery.")
> > abuse at fsec.or.kr and cert at fsec.or.kr do the same thing.
> > - Brian
More information about the NANOG