deploying RPKI based Origin Validation
ggm at algebras.org
Tue Jul 17 18:11:37 UTC 2018
I don't want to over-state it, but 'number of prefices' slways feels
to me like a potential mis-measure. Not that you don't want to know
it, but % of announced space for a given origin-as feels like it might
be closer to the story, because there can be so many different ways to
announce it as dis- and super aggregates.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 01:27:09PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> > Markus Weber from KPN is generating a daily report here and drew
>> > similar conclusions: https://as286.net/data/ana-invalids.txt Markus
>> > scrapes all routes from the AS 286 PEs and marks the routes for
>> > which no valid or unknown alternative exists as "altpfx=NONE".
>> Thanks. Protein.
>> So the numbers are not that far off from when I last checked this back
>> in 2016, i.e., less than 1% of the total IPv4 routing table.
>> Do you have numbers for IPv6, out of interest?
> There are ~ 330 IPv6 invalids in the DFZ, and for 70 of those no
> alternative covering prefix exists.
> Kind regards,
More information about the NANOG