Comparison of freeware open source switch software?
hugo at slabnet.com
Tue Jan 9 15:49:05 UTC 2018
Just a note that Cumulus is disaggregated and built on FOSS, but it is not
free (costs dollars).
Some of the below lifted from
Other somewhat free options, some user assembly required at times:
Others that play in this space while not necessarily free:
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
On Tue 2018-Jan-09 13:14:10 +0000, Edwin Pers <EPers at ansencorp.com> wrote:
>Here's one you missed:
>If you're only interested in stuff that goes on iron, openvswitch is out - it's pure software meant to run on hypervisors
>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher
>Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 2:18 AM
>To: nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: Comparison of freeware open source switch software?
>I have seen numerous comparisons and RIPE presentations on performance issues of BIRD vs Quagga vs FRR.
>I am looking for the same thing for freeware switch software.
>Has anyone done a feature comparison between:
>...any other I am missing...
>I am familiar with:
>so to clarify I am interested only in bare-metal or whitebox swicthes and freeware, open source software.
>And even better - has anyone done a benchmark to see which performs best?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the NANOG