Spectrum prefix hijacks

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Jan 3 03:19:57 UTC 2018


On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:51 PM, James Milko <jmilko at gmail.com> wrote:

> The output I dumped was from route-views.routeviews.org.  On affected
> prefes you get 7843->6453->nothing unaffected prefixes get
> 7843->6453->15169.  Unaffected prefixes don't have more specifics from
> 10512.  My sample size is only 8 though with a mix of affected and
> unaffected users.
>
>
sadly I'm guessing that the peers of 203040 need to clamp down their prefix
filters :(

(since I see no data in radb, ripe, arin-rr for AS10512 ... I think their
prefix-list should be zero length?)


> JM
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Christopher Morrow <
> morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> it looks like 203040 is a pure transit as (no originated prefixes) and
>> 1103 - surfnet could squish what is your view anyway.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:29 PM, Christopher Morrow <
>> morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:50 PM, James Milko <jmilko at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not sure if anyone from Spectrum is looking here at this hour, but
>>>> someone
>>>> is hijacking a few of your prefixes.  It's causing problems in my area
>>>> (NC)
>>>> with reaching Google services.  I'm sure there are other impacts, but
>>>> that's what people are noticing.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry if this hits the list twice, I sent it from the wrong e-mail
>>>> address
>>>> the first go round.
>>>>
>>>>  *   107.12.0.0/16    193.0.0.56                             0 3333
>>>> 1103
>>>> 203040 10512 i
>>>>  *>                   103.247.3.45                           0 58511
>>>> 203040
>>>> 10512 i
>>>>  *   107.13.0.0/16    193.0.0.56                             0 3333
>>>> 1103
>>>> 203040 10512 i
>>>>  *>                   103.247.3.45                           0 58511
>>>> 203040
>>>> 10512 i
>>>>  *   107.14.0.0/16    193.0.0.56                             0 3333
>>>> 1103
>>>> 203040 10512 i
>>>>      Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
>>>>  *>                   103.247.3.45                           0 58511
>>>> 203040
>>>> 10512 i
>>>>  *   107.15.0.0/16    193.0.0.56                             0 3333
>>>> 1103
>>>> 203040 10512 i
>>>>  *                    103.247.3.45                           0 58511
>>>> 203040
>>>> 10512 i
>>>>
>>>
>>> E-Forex you say? shocker:
>>>
>>> AS      | BGP IPv4 Prefix     | AS Name
>>> 10512   | 102.164.0.0/16      | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 102.194.0.0/16      | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 103.116.0.0/16      | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 106.128.0.0/16      | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 106.129.0.0/16      | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 106.130.0.0/16      | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 106.131.0.0/16      | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 107.12.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 107.13.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 107.14.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 107.15.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 14.5.0.0/16         | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 147.17.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 180.237.0.0/16      | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.183.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.185.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.186.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.187.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.188.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.189.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.190.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.191.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.192.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.193.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.194.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>> 10512   | 42.195.0.0/16       | EFOREX-AS - E-FOREX, US
>>>
>>> I'm going to guess they are hijacking a bunch of space and sending spam?
>>> (the 42/8 space is variously telecom malaysia and china unicom)
>>> the 102 space is un-allocated afrnic space... probably no good these
>>> folk are up to.
>>>
>>>
>>
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list