Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX

Mike Hammett nanog at ics-il.net
Fri Dec 21 14:03:28 UTC 2018


As far as neutral, I meant separate from the datacenters in which they're housed. People in NA seem to think there are only two kinds of IXes, Equinix, DRT, Coresite types and NWAX, SIX, MICE types. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Tim Raphael" <raphael.timothy at gmail.com> 
To: "NANOG Mailing List" <nanog at nanog.org> 
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 8:39:42 PM 
Subject: Re: Non-profit IX vs. neutral for-profit IX 

The other point to consider is that a NFP can justify more locations and offer services (such as extended reach) that don’t have the same profit margins or ROI as for-profits. 
This often leads to greater value to those with smaller networks and fewer customers allowing them to grow and expand without increased aggregation or transit costs. This in-turn leads to a richer array of providers and chips away at the monopolies in niche markets. 

The NFP IXP I work for focuses on providing value to the broader community and the Internet as a whole - especially somewhere like Australia which has unique constraints. 

Additionally, “Neutral” and For-Profit doesn’t always compute in my mind, there will always be commercial alliances that lead to not-total neutrality. 
When a NFP is owned by it’s members there has to be 100% transparency in organisational decisions around member funds and resources which ensures accountability reliability. 

- Tim 


> On 21 Dec 2018, at 3:58 am, Brielle Bruns <bruns at 2mbit.com> wrote: 
> 
> On 12/20/2018 12:51 PM, Aaron wrote: 
>> Probably price. Also perception of value. If you're a for profit enterprise then they're paying for interconnection plus your bump. If you're non-profit the perception is that there is a larger value because there's no bump. Whether that's true or not, who knows but that's the perception I've heard. 
> 
> Depending on the size of the non-profit, I'd almost compare it to how the hospitals are here in Boise. 
> 
> The non-profits are oversized, monopolistic, price gouging, etc. Their care can be pretty meh, esp since they bought up all the little independent clinics (yay, ER pricing for a basic family clinic visit). 
> 
> The for-profit smaller clinics and hospitals run a pretty tight ship, better value for their money, service is very good, and compete with one another for who has the best service. 
> 
> People think they are getting 'better' because they are going to a place that is supposed to be run to benefit people over profit, but alas, you'd be very very wrong. 
> -- 
> Brielle Bruns 
> The Summit Open Source Development Group 
> http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org 
> 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181221/6833ca35/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list