How to choose a transport(terrestrial/subsea)

Mehmet Akcin mehmet at akcin.net
Mon Dec 17 20:51:38 UTC 2018


Back to main discussion....

How do we choose the best transport?

One question, how much people care about vendor diversity? I do and did
care. I don’t want to put all my eggs in one basket. Do you care? Thank you

Mehmet

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:30 Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:

> I haven't.
>
> Sure, but the equipment still does smaller channels. Going to 100G or 400G
> for just over 10G seems silly.
>
> If Equinix had reasonable cross connects, I'd just LAG 10Gs. The cost of a
> pair of Equinix cross connects isn't much less than the 10G wave.
> Thankfully I'm only in one datacenter with such a ridiculous model.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Ben Cannon" <ben at 6by7.net>
> *To: *"Mike Hammett" <nanog at ics-il.net>
> *Cc: *"Luke Guillory" <lguillory at reservetele.com>, "nanog" <
> nanog at nanog.org>
> *Sent: *Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:27:21 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: How to choose a transport(terrestrial/subsea)
>
> Mike have you looked at Packetlight?   Long-haul is mostly jumping to 100
> or even 400g coherent.
>
> -Ben
>
> On Dec 15, 2018, at 8:53 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
>
> FS had one, but it's not on their site anymore.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Luke Guillory" <lguillory at reservetele.com>
> *To: *"Mike Hammett" <nanog at ics-il.net>
> *Cc: *"Eric Dugas" <edugas at unknowndevice.ca>, "nanog" <nanog at nanog.org>
> *Sent: *Saturday, December 15, 2018 10:52:19 AM
> *Subject: *Re: How to choose a transport(terrestrial/subsea)
>
> No cost affective 10x10G to 100G muxponder?
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 15, 2018, at 4:46 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
>
> heh, cross connects are indeed a major issue. I have a need for > 10G
> transport. My equipment supports 40G. The carriers aren't terribly
> interested in doing 40G transport (at least not at a reasonable price, one
> quote was over 4x a 10G). 100G-capable switches cost too much. Equinix
> charges as much for a pair of cross connects as a 10G wave. Carriers aren't
> likely to be interested in using bidi optics or passive WDM to overcome the
> ridiculous cross connect charges.
>
> This all complicates how one chooses transport. There's no easy path
> forward.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Eric Dugas" <edugas at unknowndevice.ca>
> *To: *"Mehmet Akcin" <mehmet at akcin.net>
> *Cc: *"nanog" <nanog at nanog.org>
> *Sent: *Friday, December 14, 2018 11:42:53 AM
> *Subject: *Re: How to choose a transport(terrestrial/subsea)
>
> I also look at hand-off locations (as long as it doesn't compromise the
> overall robustness of the design).
>
> Most providers will be able to hand-off in the BMMR of a carrier hotel and
> some will have the flexibility to hand-off in particular suites within the
> same building or other locations near where the cross-connects fees are
> lower. I've seen cross-connect fees between $50 up to $750 MRC so if you
> need multiple wavelengths (for capacity), the cross-connect fees are going
> to make a huge difference on the total MRC.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> Luke Guillory
> Vice President – Technology and Innovation
>
>
> <http://www.rtconline.com>
> Tel: 985.536.1212
> Fax: 985.536.0300
> Email: lguillory at reservetele.com
> Web: www.rtconline.com
> Reserve Telecommunications
> 100 RTC Dr
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=100+RTC+Dr+%0D%0AReserve,+LA+70084&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Reserve, LA 70084
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=100+RTC+Dr+%0D%0AReserve,+LA+70084&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Disclaimer:*
> The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for
> the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate,
> distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by
> e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail
> from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
> error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore
> does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of
> this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
>
> On Dec 14 2018, at 12:17 pm, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
>
> Thank you everyone incredible amounts of responses for my how to choose a
> transit provider smail earlier.
>
> How do you choose transport & backbone?
>
> Looking at key aspects like route information, diversity, aerial vs under
> ground fiber, age of fiber, outage history, length, but what else?
>
> I will get both transport and transit as two seperate blogs.
>
> I will also submit as a nanog paper for the meeting after next, or maybe
> next? I am probably too late by now.
>
> Thank you for all your help. I will add your names to the thank you line
> ;-)
> --
> Mehmet
> +1-424-298-1903
>
>
>
>
> --
Mehmet
+1-424-298-1903
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181217/3bb1034c/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list