Feedback - SBC Vendors.

Shawn Ritchie shawnritchie at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 21:47:04 UTC 2018


I second what's been said about ACME Packet; loved them when we first got
them, phasing them out now in favor of Ribbon due to what a pain Oracle has
been to deal with.

We're all hardware on the Ribbon side, using both the 5k line and some
premise 1k SBC's. They've been fine so far.

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 9:26 AM Ryan Finnesey <ryan at finnesey.com> wrote:

> Thanks I will post there as well
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Hiers, David <David.Hiers at cdk.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 10:11:33 AM
> To: James Milko; Ryan Finnesey
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Feedback - SBC Vendors.
>
> You might want to drop this question on the VoiceOps list:
>
> voiceops at voiceops.org
>
> It runs at a good signal-to-noise ratio, so you'll get some useful
> responses.
>
>
> David
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+david.hiers=cdk.com at nanog.org] On
> Behalf Of James Milko
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 7:06 AM
> To: Ryan Finnesey <ryan at finnesey.com>
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Feedback - SBC Vendors.
>
>  Which Ribbon product are you looking at?  There are quite a few now and
> they have different code bases/features.
>
> JM
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Ryan Finnesey <ryan at finnesey.com> wrote:
>
> > I am going to have to install a series of SBCs for a  voice offering
> > connected to Microsoft Teams.  We are going to pass the SIP traffic
> > off to a larger number of SIP providers.  I would like  to get some
> > feedback from the group on SBC vendors.  I have two options for
> > vendors Ribbon or AudioCodes.  I am leaning towards a software based SBC
> over an appliance.
> >
> > Would be helpful to get the other members feedback on Ribbon or
> > AudioCodes deployments within their networks.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ryan
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, notify the sender immediately by
> return email and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
>


-- 
Shawn


More information about the NANOG mailing list