Definition of ISP vs Transit provider
lguillory at reservetele.com
Thu Nov 23 04:24:58 UTC 2017
Those normally come with ASRs and a tariff from the regulated side of things. At least from my experience anyway.
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 22, 2017, at 10:08 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman at meetinghouse.net<mailto:mfidelman at meetinghouse.net>> wrote:
On 11/22/17 2:50 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei <
jfmezei_nanog at vaxination.ca<mailto:jfmezei_nanog at vaxination.ca>> wrote:
The FCC is about to reclassify "Broadband Internet Access Service" as an
information service instead of Telecommunications Service. This
prombpted the following question which isn't about the FCC action per say.
This is about how does one define Transit provider vs ISP ?
For that matter, how does one distinguish between someone delivering IP packets, vs. someone offering frame relay, or ATM - which are clearly telecom services?
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
[cid:imagea31855.JPG at 9f5ca8aa.498ff694] <http://www.rtconline.com>
Email: lguillory at reservetele.com
100 RTC Dr
Reserve, LA 70084
The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
More information about the NANOG