lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM

• Previous message (by thread): lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM
• Next message (by thread): lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/29/2017 01:11 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <1d458e76-ab61-db28-79cb-6aabcab4ff3b at mtcc.com> you write:
>> I've been saying for years that it should be possible to create the
>> concept of DKIM-friendly mailing lists. ...
> I suppose, if your users are OK with no subject tags, message footers,
> or any of the other cruft that list users have taken for granted for
> the past 30 years.
>

Message footers and subject lines can be dealt with. That's already been 
proven within
the current DKIM spec.

Mike

• Previous message (by thread): lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM
• Next message (by thread): lists and DMARC and ARC, was Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]