Vendors spamming NANOG attendees

Ge Dupin gdupin at taho.fr
Wed Jun 21 13:38:28 CST 2017


I think so
And I said it a coulpe of times already
Ge

> Le 21 juin 2017 à 15:25, Josh Luthman <josh at imaginenetworksllc.com> a écrit :
> 
> Does anyone else feel this thread has generated more spam in their inbox
> than the vendors?
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Jay Hennigan <jay at west.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/13/17 10:28 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>> 
>>> But as I said, harvesting emails is not illegal under can spam. And the
>>> requirement to not send you UCE to harvested emails is pointless, because
>>> how do you prove that someone did that?
>>> 
>> Seed the list with one or two spamtrap addresses never seen in the wild.
>> Wait.
>> 
>> In this case, the spammer was stupid enough hot only to abuse a list of
>> technical people who run networks, but to brag about it within the body of
>> the spam.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay at impulse.net
>> Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
>> Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
>> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list