Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior
cook at cookreport.com
Wed Jun 21 00:49:14 CST 2017
Hi Alain and all the rest
I het it now
no offense and alain no harm done and all of nanog thank you and i will continue observing as i have since 1995
thank you allagin
PS and BTW i am interested in CLOUD
thanks once more
> On Jun 19, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Alain Hebert <ahebert at pubnix.net> wrote:
> Yes Stephen, we're talking the usual like GTT...
> And no latency wise they're about the same. In the 35ms range.
> But I still can't figure out the 10 x drop, that level of latency alone cannot be the factor.
> ( And Gordy... what?!? )
> Alain Hebert ahebert at pubnix.net
> PubNIX Inc.
> 50 boul. St-Charles
> P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
> Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
> On 06/16/17 19:42, Stephen Fulton wrote:
>> When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are these PNI's with Google? Do the GCLD instance you reach through "normal peering" have higher latency than through TorIX?
>> -- Stephen
>> On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
>>> Anyone aware of different traffic behavior depending if the target goes through normal peering than through an exchanges google exists in?
>>> We're facing a weird issue where the same GCLD Instance can upload up to 200Mbps (Ref 1) if the target path goes through, lets say TorIX, but cannot get more than 20Mbps on similar hosts (8 of them) sittings on our peering links.
>>> PS; Those sames hosts get up to their link limit ( 1Gbps ) between each others and others test points we have;
>>> PS: Wireshark capture show nothing abnormal;
>>> PS: Links aren't congested, and so on...
>>> Ref 1 - 200Mbps is on a link rate-limited to 300Mbps. Its my only test point with a TorIX access
More information about the NANOG