Russian diplomats lingering near fiber optic cables
Gordon Cook
cook at cookreport.com
Sun Jun 11 18:59:30 UTC 2017
I have just scanned this whole thread - it is the most amazing analysis of technical details I have e ver seen
national security also
sean I am taking this in the sense of what the hell could these russian diplomats be doing?
I have been a nanog reader since this list began in the spring of 1995 i believe
remember i am parsing comments from the russian side as well
i met aleksei soldatov at the kurchatov institute for the first time in april 1992. about 3 days earlier i met the demos guys who told soldatov suggested to soldatov that he should met me at kurchatov
I followed the development of the russian internet very closely between April 1992 and 1999 not much after that.
meanwhile i am
well aware of international fiber optic cables geographic issues of same — see telegeography for example, His coordinates etc
interception of cable via submarine etc
see the US Sub named Jimmy carter
I visited Russia for the first time in 1964
my dissertation completed in 1972
dis on site work for the Phd in Russia for 2 months summer of 1970
including pushkinskii Dom
Thanks to steve Goldstein of NSF I received an invite to attend the second Nato sponsored conference on the future e of the russian internet met larry land weber there at Golitsyno - the conf was sept 30 to Oct 2 1994
The point? I have long experience with my Cook Report on Internet Protocol in April 1992 issue #1
and an even lon\ger experience with russian history language and culture
I am also well aware this message will be readable by a ver large number of people both here and abroad.
even visited the westin bldg In i think 1994.
take a bow Sean!!
:-)
> On Jun 11, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Gordon Cook <cook at cookreport.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sean
>
> You and I first met when i was at OIA about 1992 LOONG TIME ago
>
> Always thought of you as brilliant collector of info as well as analyst there of
>
> this question of yours is absolutely brilliant
>
> look at the responses (more) than 45!!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jun 1, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Sean Donelan <sean at donelan.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> There must be a perfectly logical explanation.... Yes, people in the industry know where the choke points are. But the choke points aren't always the most obvious places. Its kinda a weird for diplomats to show up there.
>>
>> On the other hand, I've been a fiber optic tourist. I've visited many critical choke points in the USA and other countries, and even took selfies :-)
>>
>>
>> http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/01/russia-spies-espionage-trump-239003
>>
>> In the throes of the 2016 campaign, the FBI found itself with an escalating problem: Russian diplomats, whose travel was supposed to be tracked by the State Department, were going missing.
>>
>> The diplomats, widely assumed to be intelligence operatives, would eventually turn up in odd places, often in middle-of-nowhere USA. One was found on a beach, nowhere near where he was supposed to be. In one particularly bizarre case, relayed by a U.S. intelligence official, another turned up wandering around in the middle of the desert. Interestingly, both seemed to be lingering where underground fiber-optic cables tend to run.
>>
>> According to another U.S. intelligence official, “They find these guys driving around in circles in Kansas. It’s a pretty aggressive effort.”
>>
>> It’s a trend that has led intelligence officials to conclude that the Kremlin is waging a quiet effort to map the United States’ telecommunications infrastructure, perhaps preparing for an opportunity to disrupt it.
>>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list