BGP Route Reflector - Route Server, Router, etc

Fri Jan 13 04:02:07 UTC 2017

On Thu 2017-Jan-12 22:59:21 +0000, James Bensley <jwbensley at gmail.com> wrote:

>On 12 January 2017 at 20:32, Justin Krejci <JKrejci at usinternet.com> wrote:
>> . I have not found many resources discussing using a non-router box as a route reflector (ie a device not necessarily in the forwarding path of the through traffic). I am thinking things like OpenBGPd and BIRD could make a good route reflector though they are most often discussed in the context of IXPs (ie eBGP sessions).
>
>The CSR1000v (IOS-XE),IOS-XRv and vMX are production ready. People are
>deploying these in production and its increasing in popularity.

Any thoughts on vRR vs. vMX for this use case?  I see Mark called out vRR 
as having morphed into vMX, but AFAIK vRR is just vMX minus the forwarding 
plane, is targeted as an out-of-path reflector, and coexists with vMX as a 
different deployment option rather than having been replaced by it.  I 
would assume that vRR should come in a few bucks lower than the vMX as a 
result, but I've only previously gotten quotes on vRR not vMX.

>Mark Tinka gave a good preso at a recent Nanog:
>https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/2_Tinka_21st_Century_iBGP_Route_Reflection.pdf
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLEjOj2fyp8&list=PLO8DR5ZGla8hcpeEDSBNPE5OrZf70iXZg&index=21
>
>Cheers,
>James.

-- 
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20170112/fd42f1b0/attachment.sig>