Bandwidth Savings
Mike Hammett
nanog at ics-il.net
Thu Jan 12 13:35:12 UTC 2017
Peering is great when you can get to the IX inexpensively. I assume that glass that goes underwater has a significant increase in cost and therefore the cost savings of peering would be minuscule in comparison to the cost of the rest of the connectivity.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hicks" <richard.hicks at gmail.com>
To: "Keenan Singh" <keenansingh at airlinktt.net>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 2:55:05 PM
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Savings
I don't know the the Caribbean Internet Exchanges market. Are any worth
peering at versus buying additional L2 bandwidth to Miami?
https://cw.ams-ix.net/
http://www.ocix.net/ocix/
Rick
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Keenan Singh <keenansingh at airlinktt.net>
wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> We are an ISP in the Caribbean, and are faced with extremely high Bandwidth
> costs, compared to the US, we currently use Peer App for Caching however
> with most services now moving to HTTPS the cache is proving to be less and
> less effective. We are currently looking at any way we can save on
> Bandwidth or to be more Efficient with the Bandwidth we currently have. We
> do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing there
> are WAN Accelerators where they would put a Server on either end and sort
> of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I
> have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this, what
> results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic?
>
> If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want we
> currently.
>
> Many thanks for any Help
>
> Keenan
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list