RPKI coverage statistics
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Tue Feb 21 07:25:41 UTC 2017
On 21/02/2017 08:22, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG wrote:
> I am trying to solve the problem of BGP IP prefix hijack detection for the
> AS we own using RPKI system.
> But IP addresses covered under RPKI system is very less under 10%.
> How is community dealing with UNKNOWN state for the prefixes when queried
> against RPKI system.
from NANOG 69 earlier this month.
> Reply from the community members shows that majority are using RPKI system.
> Is community using anyother methods on top of RPKI ?
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:31 PM Alex Band <alexb at ripe.net> wrote:
>> Hi Nagarjun,
>> You can find some statistics on adoption, coverage and quality here:
>> All the best,
>> Alex Band
>>> On 20 Feb 2017, at 06:52, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
>>> Hi All,
>>> where can I found the current coverage of IP prefixes under RPKI system.
>>> Stats like total prefixes issued collectively by all the organisations
>>> stats like prefixes coverd under RPKI system.
>>> The goal is to detect the BGP IP prefix hijacking using RPKI system.
>>> I would like to know the coverage before adopting RPKI system.
>>> I would like to know the suggestions from the community on using this
More information about the NANOG