Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69?

Jay Hanke jayhanke at
Mon Feb 6 23:14:38 UTC 2017

The peering social at previous NANOG meetings has been excellent and
very useful. As you mentioned, the peering personals are perhaps not
as valuable. It would be great to see the social portion come back in
some form.


On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Dave Temkin <dave at> wrote:
> The Peering Personals has been shelved while we try to figure out a better option.
> There was no peering content submitted to the Program Committee that justified a separate track, and so they chose to include the content in the general session throughout the program.
> Regards,
> -Dave
> On Feb 6, 2017, 8:12 AM -0500, Matthew Petach <mpetach at>, wrote:
>> I'm squinting at the Guidebook for NANOG69,
>> and I don't seem to see any peering BOF or
>> peering social this time around. Am I being
>> blind again, and it's on the agenda somewhere
>> but I'm just overlooking it?
>> Pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
>> Thanks! :)
>> Matt

More information about the NANOG mailing list