Waste will kill ipv6 too

valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
Thu Dec 21 00:14:51 CST 2017

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:15:44 -0500, Joe Maimon said:

> There is plenty more to wonder about, for example, will the rest of the
> unicast space get Class E'd?

That's a non-starter, as pretty much all the gear out there has code that says
'Class E is reserved" (including gear that's *already* doing production IPv6).  If
you're going to upgrade everything *anyhow*, deploying IPv6 has better bang for
the buck than Class E support.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20171220/5823884c/attachment.sig>

More information about the NANOG mailing list