Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing

Ca By cb.list6 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 20 23:01:20 CST 2017


On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:54 PM Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:

> As someone who has written a DNS64 implementation - DO NOT USE DNS64.
> DNS64 breaks stuff.
>
> Use MAP-T.  For those of you using DNS64 on the cellar side MAP-T can use
> the NAT64 you already have.
>
> Mark
>


That’s just your opinion, man. Works for me and my 70 million customers.

Anything that is broken by DNS64 can be properly fixed by eliminating the
need for it — by deploying ipv6. DNS64 only appears when the far end
resource is single stacked (!)

We won’t be held hostage by folks who refuse to deploy ipv6, those days are
over

Happy holidays!



>
> > On 21 Dec 2017, at 9:33 am, Jens Link <lists at quux.de> wrote:
> >
> > Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> http://jool.mx/en/index.html
> >>
> >> Free open source nat64
> >
> > And the DNS64 part can be done with powerdns (recursor), unbound, bind,
> > ... All OpenSource
> >
> > Jens
> > --
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > | Foelderichstr. 40   | 13595 Berlin, Germany           |
> +49-151-18721264 |
> > | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at quux.de        |
> ---------------  |
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka at isc.org
>
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list