Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing

Oliver O'Boyle oliver.oboyle at gmail.com
Wed Dec 20 17:56:08 CST 2017


Agreed. There now. We need cheap, open source, options for widespread
adoption.

Oliver

On Dec 20, 2017 12:51, "Michael Crapse" <michael at wi-fiber.io> wrote:

> +1 for Nat64. dual stack is just keeping ipv4 around longer than it needs
> to be
>
> On 19 December 2017 at 18:50, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Dec 19, 2017, at 07:39 , Livingood, Jason <
> > Jason_Livingood at comcast.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 12/18/17, 2:36 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Harald Koch" <
> > nanog-bounces at nanog.org on behalf of chk at pobox.com> wrote:
> > >> They could use IPv6. I mean, if the mobile phone companies can figure
> > it out, surely an ISP can...
> > >
> > > Except for cases when it is impossible or impractical to update
> software
> > on a great number of legacy devices…
> > >
> > > JL
> > >
> > >
> > Yeah, in those cases, they should use IPv6 + NAT64 or similar mechanism.
> >
> > Owen
> >
> >
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list