Free access to measurement network
Mike Hammett
nanog at ics-il.net
Mon Dec 18 16:05:08 UTC 2017
BTW: There are no government-enforced monopolies anywhere in the US, aside from possibly Native American reservations.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edwin Pers" <EPers at ansencorp.com>
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog at ics-il.net>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 10:03:52 AM
Subject: RE: Free access to measurement network
Yes, the fact that both the city I work in and the town I live in have local govt-enforced monopolies reinforces the statement that I've (and all the other people near me) been voting with our collective wallets this entire time
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 10:23 AM
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Free access to measurement network
It's a consumer thing. If consumers wanted more options, they would be supporting those options with their wallets. They don't.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Tulyev" <maxtul at netassist.ua>
To: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 4:43:54 AM
Subject: Re: Free access to measurement network
So for my point of view, better solution is to push some law that ease access to the buildings for ISPs.
15.12.17 19:40, valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu пише:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:47:42 -0500, Dovid Bender said:
>> What kind of internet are these devices on? With Net Neutrality gone
>> here in the US it would be a good way to measure certain services
>> such as SIP to see which ISP's if any are tampering with packets.
>
> Given previous history, the answer will probably be "most of them".
>
> "The results are not inspiring. More than 129 million people are
> limited to a single provider for broadband Internet access using the
> FCC definition of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload. Out of those 129
> million Americans, about 52 million must obtain Internet access from a
> company that has violated network neutrality protections in the past and continues to undermine the policy today.
>
> In locations where subscribers have the benefit of limited
> competition, the situation isn't much better. Among the 146 million
> Americans with the ability to choose between two providers, 48 million
> Americans must choose between two companies that have a record of violating network neutrality."
>
> https://muninetworks.org/content/177-million-americans-harmed-net-neut
> rality
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list