Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32

Radu-Adrian Feurdean nanog at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Fri Dec 15 11:29:37 CST 2017


On Fri, Dec 8, 2017, at 21:02, Job Snijders wrote:
> Nothing wrong with using xxx.0 or xxx::0 in the context of a host route
> (/32 or /128).

https://labs-pre.ripe.net/Members/stephane_bortzmeyer/all-ip-addresses-are-equal-dot-zero-addresses-are-less-equal

For a host route, no problem. For the host itself - a slightly different
story.


More information about the NANOG mailing list