Static Routing

Radu-Adrian Feurdean nanog at
Fri Dec 15 11:29:37 CST 2017

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017, at 21:02, Job Snijders wrote:
> Nothing wrong with using xxx.0 or xxx::0 in the context of a host route
> (/32 or /128).

For a host route, no problem. For the host itself - a slightly different

More information about the NANOG mailing list